The Short sale is a foreclosure alternative which provides an outstanding opportunity for the lender, the borrower/seller, and a prospective purchaser to mitigate damages. Unfortunately, in today’s troubled real estate marketplace, the short sale process is one fraught with a substantial amount of misunderstanding and delay, which may result in frustration that can be avoided. Utilizing basic fundamental information and a well-thought-out approach, a short sale can be achieved for the benefit of the borrower, lender, and prospective purchaser, as well as with a reduction in the amount of frustration and effort on behalf of the real estate professionals (real estate brokers, real estate attorneys and/or title agents) involved in such transaction.
1. DEFINITION OF A SHORT SALE
A short sale involving real estate is defined as a transaction in which the purchase price of the property is less than the amount necessary to pay off the mortgage and related closing expenses which results in the lender considering either;
2. PRE SHORT SALE PREPARATION, DUE DILIGENCE AND MITIGATION EFFORTS
Prior to presenting a short sale contract to the lender for determination of lender’s approval of a short sale, the borrower (and, more precisely, the borrower’s real estate professional representatives and, ideally, a real estate attorney) should undertake the following steps:
3.) PRE SHORT SALE MODIFICATION EFFORTS
It is not a necessary prerequisite to engage in a formal mortgage modification application in order to proceed with a short sale, especially in the event that the borrower decides that it is either:
While a mortgage modification effort might in some cases result in the resolution of the existing loan problem, a mortgage modification should be undertaken only in the event that the borrower acknowledges its desire to retain title to the property and continue to service the debt or some portion thereof and is willing to work through the application process. If the borrower is unable or unwilling to continue with mortgage payments, processing an entire mortgage modification review is simply a waste of the borrower’s and lender’s time and also contributes to additional carry costs (increasing deficiency exposure) on the property while utilizing a procedure and process which has no chance of success.
4.) LISTING OF THE PROPERTY FOR SHORT SALE
In order to be successful in the short sale, a number of realities must be addressed, starting with initially evaluating and determining the current fair market value of the property for purposes of selling the property within the next 30, 60 to 90 days.
It is important to have a Broker/agent who is trained in the area of short sales, who clearly understands the real estate marketplace, and who knows the specific property attempting to be short sold. Having such a Broker/agent is crucial in setting the appropriate price of the property. The purchase price on a short sale may not accurately reflect the fair market value of the property under normal circumstances, since an effective short sale price (see definition below) might be influenced by the urgency to sell.
5.) “FAIR MARKET VALUE”
Fair Market Value in Florida is defined as “the amount that would be paid for the property to a willing seller, not compelled to sell, by a willing buyer, not compelled to buy.” Savers Federal Sav. & Loan Asso. v. Sandcastle Beach Joint Venture, 498 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).
This is the traditional current fair market value definition for deficiency judgments in Florida but may only be a general “guideline” as to what a short sale price should reflect. In today’s real estate economy in which prices are either stagnant (or in many circumstances still continuing to freefall) the current listing price for a short sale should be determined and identified as that price which will enable a property to be sold in today’s marketplace within the next 30, 60, to 90 days. This generally means a purchase price to move the property in relation to the many other properties on the marketplace, all of which themselves are being sold at distressed prices.
The reality is that the purchase price on a short sale is not going to be a reflection of the traditional “current fair market value price” and, in many instances, does not even reflect the actual hard costs to rebuild this property at a square footage price. Most short sale prices are coming in below what the actual cost would be to construct the residential unit, even without any consideration to the actual land and improvements upon which the residential unit is located. A successful short sale participant must be cognizant of these facts.
6.) OBTAINMENT OF SHORT SALE CONTRACT
Once a short sale contract is obtained, the real estate professional must make sure that the prospective purchaser is qualified to purchase the property for cash or has a prequalification letter indicating their ability to obtain financing to acquire the property at the purchase price as set for in the contract. A frustrating delay in getting short sale approval is to have a short sale contract subject to a 45 or 60-day financing contingency from the borrower, whom may not have a prequalification letter and may not be able to close the transaction. Worse yet the lender may simply reject a contract from an unqualified purchaser which ends up wasting valuable time with no tangible result.
In a successful short sale program, it is not mandatory that the borrower have cash or a prequalification letter. However, under the circumstances of the current marketplace, the failure to locate a cash buyer or buyer with prequalification is tantamount to a recipe for failure or, alternatively, a long delay that could create additional problems. The real estate professional should pre-qualify the buyer.
7.) QUALIFIED BUYER FOR CASH OR PREQUALIFICATION LETTER
If a qualified buyer submits an offer which is within a price close in proximity to what the seller and his real estate professionals believe would be an appropriate price, the seller should accept the contract offer provided the contract for sale and purchase contains appropriate contractual language with minimal contingencies (minimal inspection periods, no financing contingencies, etc.). As importantly, a specific short sale addendum (see attached format) should be made part of the contract, which relieves the seller of performance obligations if the lender does not approve and release the seller at closing.
Again, a real estate professional (preferably a qualified real estate attorney) should assist the buyer in this process as not to make matters worse by having an inappropriately drafted contract for sale and purchase which hasn’t been thought out and properly drafted.
8.) PRESENTMENT PROCESS FOR SHORT SALE CONTRACT TO LENDER
Once the contract for sale and purchase is obtained, the loss mitigation specialist of the lender (this person should have been identified prior to this process beginning) should be contacted and requested to process the contract application.
To assist the lender in the contract release process, the seller/borrower should provide the lender with the following:
The most effective way to present a short sale package to the lender is to provide the lender with a proposed HUD1 closing statement identifying a closing within 45-60 days showing the closing proceeds that the lender would net from the closing of the short sale. This would be the lender’s net closing proceeds as set forth on line 506 of the HUD1 closing statement and shows the net cash due to the seller on line 603 of the HUD1 closing statement as “zero.”
9.) REASONABLE CLOSING EXPENSES
It should also be identified that the closing expenses, including real estate commissions, should be reasonable. Many lenders will allow no more than four (4) percent to be paid to the real estate professionals, but up to six (6) percent may still be acceptable, subject to an appropriate purchase price and the realization that all closing expenses are going to be amounts reduced from the seller’s net closing proceeds, which leads to the next phase: the negotiation of the borrower’s potential deficiency.
10.) THE STEPS IN LENDER EVALUATION PROCESS
The lender has a three step process which consists of:
In order to make its determination, the lenders will require an analysis of the borrowers’ ability to pay which will be based on the aforementioned financial statement, worksheet and affidavit before the lender will approve such short sale arrangement and release of the borrower. Having all of the information with the lender’s representative will assist in speeding up the decision making process.
11.) NEGOTIATION PHASE
This is the frustrating phase, especially when participants have unreasonable expectations of approval, which are inherently delayed based upon the backlog in cases, or, alternatively, the lenders are indecisive or assign a representative who does not have final authority to approve the sale.
The real estate attorney handling this transaction should monitor the file and follow up in regard to the transaction. The attorney should also notify all parties of what the reasonable expectations are based upon the anticipated lender response. All parties should cooperate in timely providing information.
These procedures are suggested to conduct an appropriate short sale process. All participants in a short sale process should be aware of the inherent delays and work to cooperate in closing the transaction by implementing the positive and proactive procedures outlined above.
Lastly: the keys to a successful short sale are perseverance and patience based upon the confidence that all the appropriate steps have been taken to successfully conclude a short sale. An experienced real estate attorney should be conducting the negotiations for the release of the seller/borrower or, alternatively, an agreed upon procedure between seller/borrower and lender to address the deficiency post closing, with further consideration as to a release price either in the form of cash consideration, promissory note, or combination thereof.
Kevin F. Jursinski, Esquire
Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Attorney
©Law Office of Kevin F. Jursinski & Associates
Kevin F. Jursinski is recognized by the objective rating services of Martindale Hubbell as one of Southwest Florida's premier attorneys. He has concentrated more than 35 years of practice in the area of real estate, business and construction law in Naples and Fort Myers.
Firm Partner, Kara Jursinski Murphy, focuses her area of practice on Real Estate Litigation, Business Litigation and Real Estate and Business Transactional Law. Kara has earned the highly-esteemed designation of Board Certified Specialist (B.C.S.) and Expert in Real Estate by the Florida Bar. This certification recognizes attorneys who have special knowledge, skills and proficiency in various areas of law, including Real Estate, and professionalism and ethics in practice...
Associate Attorney, Michelle “Micki” Hurvitz, practices in the areas of Real Estate Litigation and Business Litigation.
William Ryan Murphy focuses his practice in the areas of Real Estate, Business and Construction Law.
My sister and I did a long distance purchase of a condo in Florida in June 2018 and we used the KFJLaw office to handle the details. From the first phone call to picking up the keys, their staff were always friendly and helpful.- Julie
Kevin and his associate Janine Decker did a great job in helping me close a property in SWFL. They were always available to answer my questions. I definitely recommend them.- Katherine
Kevin was my Attorney when I lived in Fort Myers and even after I moved To Denver he wrapped up my Florida deals with extreme professionalism. I am glad to see he is still doing the outstanding job he has always done.- David
They fought to serve our country.
Now, they are fighting with the state of Florida – over a bingo game.
A former employee at a prominent Southwest Florida air conditioning and home
services company admitted to illegally notarizing documents for the company in a court filing...
It’s by far the biggest complaint that comes to the NBC2 Investigators: Contractors accused of taking money, but not finishing the job.
Important Notice and Disclosure. While we welcome inquiries about potential representation, please do not send any confidential information about any matter before we agree to represent you in that matter or we request information. Pursuant to Opinion 07-3, dated January 16, 2009, any information sent to us unilaterally may not be treated as confidential information and, depending on the circumstances, could be used against the person sending the information. Accordingly, before sending any confidential information to us, please contact us so that we may determine if we have any conflicts of interest and if we are otherwise able to represent you.